To date, the only way to get the Newton Law of Universal Gravitation is to start with EFE using a spherical
static symmetry and weak field approximation (explained in our Einstein Field Equations PDF document).
Here we show that the Newton Law can be easily obtained by another way, replacing mass by closed volume.
This approach is much more simple than the traditional method using a reduction of tensors from EFE.

This webpage is part of the website
http://www.higgs-boson.org
To understand the demonstration, it is necessary to read the whole theory.

Background: the Bulk Modulus

The bulk modulus K_{B} of a substance measures the substance's resistance to uniform compression.
It is defined as the pressure increase needed to cause a given relative decrease in volume.

Starting with the Fluid Mechanics from 1850's, Einstein demonstrated in the 1910s that spacetime:

Can be identified to a fluid,

Returns to its rest shape after a stress was applied (elasticity properties).

Therefore, the Bulk Modulus equation (1) can be applied to spacetime.
It means that the displacement of spacetime made by a closed volume exerts a pressure on the surface
of the volume, which leads to a volume decrease DV, as shown in fig. 1.

Background: Elasticity law

Elasticity phenomena follows the well-known logarithmic law:

The Schwarzschild Metric gives an order of magnitude of the curvature of spacetime.
This latter is infinitesimal.
For example, the ratio curvature of spacetime/radius, or DR/R, is 1.4166 x 10-39
for the proton, with M = 1.672 E-27, R = 8.768 E-16, G = 6.674 E-11, c^{2} = 8.987 E+16, and
DR/R = GM/Rc^{2}.
The formula DR/R is the first order approximation of the square root of the
r radius coefficient in the Schwarzschild Metric.
Please see our Schwarzschild Metric web page for further information.

Under that conditions, whatever the formulae used, logarithmic or not, the curvature of spacetime can
be considered as a linear function since we are working on an infinitesimal segment near to the point zero.
So, this formulae becomes:

or, with volumes:

For the moment, coefficients of elasticity of spacetime e_{R} and
e_{V} are unknown.

Curvature of spacetime Dx

A closed volume V inserted into a flat spacetime pushes spacetime to make room (fig. 2).
So, the following volumes at different distances are identical:

Since the spacetime curvature is infinitesimal, the coefficient of elasticity of spacetime
e_{v} is constant, as any coefficient of elasticity if we
are working in a very small segment near zero.
So, combining (4) and (5) gives:

Curvature vs displacement of spacetime

There should not be any confusion between a simple displacement of spacetime, Vx, produced by the insertion of
a closed volume into a flat spacetime, and the curvature DV_{x}=
e_{v}V_{x} due to the elasticity of spacetime (fig. 3).

Solving Dx = f_{(DR)}

Since the DVs are infinitesimal, the volume DVx
is the product of Dx by the surface Sx (fig. 4):

On the same manner, the volume DV_{R} is the product of
DR by the surface S_{R}:

From (6) we have:

Combining equations (7), (8) and (9) gives:

Finally, we get:

where:

R is the radius of the closed volume V_{R} producing the spacetime displacement,

DR is the curvature of spacetime on the surface of the closed volume V_{R},

d is the distance of the point of measurement,

Dx is the curvature of spacetime at distance d.

Curvature (Dx) vs. Mass (M)

As seen in the following figure, a relation exists between the curvature of spacetime, DR
(or Dx at a distance "d" from R), and the mass of the object, more
precisely its "mass effect":

This formulae is not original since it comes from Einstein : Mass is identified to spacetime curvature.

It is the pressure of the spacetime curvature on the closed volume that produces the mass effect.
This suggests that the latter is inversely proportional to the surface S, or [1/L^{2}].
The mass effect is also proportional to the volume, or [L^{3}].
Therefore, the dimensional quantity of the mass effect is [1/L^{2}][L^{3}] = [L].
So, the latter can be written as : [M] ≡ [L].

This deduction is in accordance with EFE and their solutions as the Schwarzschild Metric that gives identical results.
At this point, we do not know the relation between DR and M but, in referring
to Einstein's works, we have good reasons to believe that this relation is a simple linear function:

where K is an constant having the dimensional quantity of [L/M], as we have seen.

The challenge, now, is to calculate K to get the Newton's law of Universal Gravitation.

The Newton Law

Porting equation (13) in (11) gives:

or:

Since x = ct, replacing R^{2} by c^{2}t^{2} gives:

or:

The value Dx/t^{2} has the dimensional quantity of an acceleration [L/T^{2}].
So, replacing this fraction by the acceleration symbol "a", we get:

On the other hand, the multiplication of a constant c^{2} by a second constant K gives another constant.
So, we can replace the product c^{2}K by a new unknown constant, G for example:

or:

(this equation is not necessary here but will be used for the calculation of the Schwarzschild Metric)

Porting (19) in (18) gives:

This new constant G = c^{2}K have the dimensional quantity :

c^{2} : Dimensional quantity = [L^{2}/T^{2}]

K : Dimensional quantity = [L/M],

So, the dimensional quantity of this new unknown constant G is c^{2}K = [L^{2}/T^{2}][L/M]
= [L^{3}/MT^{2}].

On the other hand, we know that the force is the product of an acceleration by a mass.
Therefore, equation (21) can be written as follow:

About G we remark:

G is a constant since it is the product of two constants, c^{2} and K,

Its dimensional quantity is [L^{3}/MT^{2}].

So, we can identify G to the constant of gravitation issued from experimentation:

G = 6,67428.10^{-11}.

As we have here demonstrated,

The proposed theory, based on closed
volumes, gives an easy and consistent
explanation of the Newton Law of Gravitation.